<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Water Cooler: Clinton for Secretary of State?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irreverentview.com/national-politics/the-water-cooler-clinton-for-secretary-of-state/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.irreverentview.com/national-politics/the-water-cooler-clinton-for-secretary-of-state</link>
	<description>Chris Ingram&#039;s political commentary with an edgy and &#34;irreverent view.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:24:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dagda</title>
		<link>http://www.irreverentview.com/national-politics/the-water-cooler-clinton-for-secretary-of-state/comment-page-1#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Dagda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irreverentview.com/?p=265#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Man, I don&#039;t have anything to disagree with on the surface, and I&#039;m not really one for nitpicking to find discontentment.

Hillary Clinton is a stupid choice for anything associated with Obama&#039;s Presidency, to be quite honest.

I&#039;m very happy to see articles beginning to examine the Republican party FROM the Republican party. There is much to be discussed, and I dearly hope they can pull their shit together. As unappetizing as a two party system is, a single party system would make for quite the stagnant country. Republicans need to find where they are and are not strong, and exercise that.

Democrats, though, are in danger of getting heady with victory. That&#039;s happened before, and look what the Bush administration did to his party! They need to keep themselves in check. It&#039;s a dangerous world right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, I don&#8217;t have anything to disagree with on the surface, and I&#8217;m not really one for nitpicking to find discontentment.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton is a stupid choice for anything associated with Obama&#8217;s Presidency, to be quite honest.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very happy to see articles beginning to examine the Republican party FROM the Republican party. There is much to be discussed, and I dearly hope they can pull their shit together. As unappetizing as a two party system is, a single party system would make for quite the stagnant country. Republicans need to find where they are and are not strong, and exercise that.</p>
<p>Democrats, though, are in danger of getting heady with victory. That&#8217;s happened before, and look what the Bush administration did to his party! They need to keep themselves in check. It&#8217;s a dangerous world right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

